<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Employment Law Information &#187; Discrimination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/category/discrimination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog</link>
	<description>Discrimination - Retaliation - Harassment - Hostile Workplace - FMLA - Workers Comp</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Military Veterans Job Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/military-veterans-job-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/military-veterans-job-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law Q & A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disabled veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hostile workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=2237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; A Reader Asks This Question: I been wondering about possible discrimination that&#8217;s happening at my job. I work in a casino and my department is made up of only war veterans and disabled war veterans. I proudly served my country for many years and I just want to know some things. For the last [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/military-veterans-job-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Origin Discrimination / Retaliation Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/national-origin-discrimination-retaliation-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/national-origin-discrimination-retaliation-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 13:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Origin Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=1833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PRESS RELEASE 4-13-10 Cannon &#38; Wendt to Pay $100,000 to Settle EEOC National Origin Discrimination / Retaliation Suit PHOENIX &#8212; The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced today that it has settled a national origin discrimination and retaliation lawsuit against Cannon &#38; Wendt Electric Co., Inc., one of the oldest and largest electrical contractors operating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/national-origin-discrimination-retaliation-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fire Department Torched in EEOC Age Discrimination Suit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fire-department-torched-in-eeoc-age-discrimination-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fire-department-torched-in-eeoc-age-discrimination-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 23:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=1831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PRESS RELEASE 4-12-10 Bayville Fire Company Settles EEOC Age Discrimination Suit Company Had Barred Firefighters Over 65 From Receiving Service Credits in Retirement Benefits Program, Federal Agency Charged NEW YORK – The Bayville Fire Company on Long Island has agreed to settle a class age discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fire-department-torched-in-eeoc-age-discrimination-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outback Steakhouse To Pay $19 Million In &#8216;Glass Ceiling&#8217; Suit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/outback-steakhouse-to-pay-19-million-in-glass-ceiling-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/outback-steakhouse-to-pay-19-million-in-glass-ceiling-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glass ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outback Steakhouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outback Steakhouse To Pay $19 Million For Sex Bias Against Women In &#8216;Glass Ceiling&#8217; Suit By EEOC Consent Decree Includes Online Application System, Creation of Executive HR Position PRESS RELEASE 12-29-09 DENVER – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today announced that Outback Steakhouse has agreed to pay $19 million and furnish significant remedial [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/outback-steakhouse-to-pay-19-million-in-glass-ceiling-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saks Fifth Avenue to Pay $170,000 in Ulcerative Colitis Suit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/saks-fifth-avenue-to-pay-170000-in-ulcerative-colitis-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/saks-fifth-avenue-to-pay-170000-in-ulcerative-colitis-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saks Fifth Avenue Settles EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit New Orleans Store Fired Employee Because of Ulcerative Colitis, Federal Agency Says PRESS RELEASE 1-7-10 HOUSTON — Saks Fifth Avenue, the high-end retailer based in New York City, has agreed to pay $170,000 to settle a disability discrimination suit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Oppor­tunity Commission [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/saks-fifth-avenue-to-pay-170000-in-ulcerative-colitis-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wal-Mart Refuses to Accommodate Deaf Women, Gets Sued</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/wal-mart-refuses-to-accommodate-deaf-women-gets-sued/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/wal-mart-refuses-to-accommodate-deaf-women-gets-sued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wal-Mart Sued for Disability Discrimination EEOC Says Retail Giant Violated ADA by Refusing to Accommodate Deaf Worker PRESS RELEASE 1-27-10 ALEXANDRIA, Va. – The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today announced a disability discrimination lawsuit against global retail giant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. for refusing to provide a reasonable accommodation to a deaf employee at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/wal-mart-refuses-to-accommodate-deaf-women-gets-sued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fashion Bug Nailed $40,000 in Age Discrimination Suit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fashion-bug-nailed-40000-in-age-discrimination-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fashion-bug-nailed-40000-in-age-discrimination-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[age discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fashion Bug]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Charming Shoppes / Fashion Bug to Pay $40,000 to Settle EEOC Age Discrimination Suit Federal Agency Charged Company Terminated Employee Because of Age PRESS RELEASE 2-3-10 ATLANTA – Charming Shoppes, Inc., an Atlanta clothing store company, will pay $40,050 to settle an age discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/fashion-bug-nailed-40000-in-age-discrimination-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proving Employment Discrimination Claims</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/proving-employment-discrimination-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/proving-employment-discrimination-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When employees are treated badly and suspect it is due to discrimination they may wish to sue. To win the plaintiff has the burden of showing that he or she was member of a protected class, the employer's action was serious and discriminatory, and there was no legitimate, non-discriminatory explanation for the employer's behavior.Here are the four guidelines to help you determine if you have a viable claim.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/proving-employment-discrimination-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Walmart To Cough Up $11.7 Million In Sex Discrimination Suit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/walmart-to-cough-up-11-7-million-in-sex-discrimination-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/walmart-to-cough-up-11-7-million-in-sex-discrimination-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:23:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walmart]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walmart To Pay More Than $11.7 Million To Settle EEOC Sex Discrimination Suit Kentucky Distribution Facility Denied Jobs to Female Applicants on a Systemic Basis, Federal Agency Charged PRESS RELEASE 3-1-10 INDIANAPOLIS –Walmart Stores will pay $11.7 million in back wages and com­pen­satory damages, its share of employer taxes, and up to $250,000 in administration [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/walmart-to-cough-up-11-7-million-in-sex-discrimination-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McDonald’s Slapped With $90,000 Disability Discrimination Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/mcdonald%e2%80%99s-slapped-with-90000-disability-discrimination-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/mcdonald%e2%80%99s-slapped-with-90000-disability-discrimination-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/?p=822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McDonald’s Franchise to Pay $90,000 to Settle EEOC Disability Discrimination Lawsuit Disabled Worker Physically Threatened and Harassed, Federal Agency Said PRESS RELEASE 3-2-10 PHILADELPHIA – Alstrun LLP, which used to own and operate a Philadelphia McDonald’s, will pay $90,000 and furnish significant equitable relief to settle a federal discrimination lawsuit on behalf of a worker [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://work-laws-exposed.com/blog/discrimination/mcdonald%e2%80%99s-slapped-with-90000-disability-discrimination-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
