age bias
EZ Trip Settles EEOC Age Bias Suit for Refusal to Hire Qualified Older Job Applicants
PRESS RELEASE
1-20-11
Older Applicants Passed Over for Cashier Positions in Favor of Younger Candidates, Federal Agency Charged
FRESNO — The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) today announced the settlement of its lawsuit against Timeless Investments, Inc., doing business as EZ Trip Golden State Convenience and Auto/Truck Plaza, resolving claims that the Fresno, Calif.-based company failed to hire older job applicants for its convenience store due to age discrimination.
The allegations date back to 2004, when a group of older job seekers in their 60s applied for jobs as cashiers at the EZ Trip Golden State convenience store in Fresno. According to the EEOC, the older applicants were separately instructed to write their ages on the top corner of their respective employment applications. They were ultimately denied employment in favor of other candidates under the age of 35, two of whom had no prior cashier experience. The EEOC asserts that the older applicants were ultimately denied employment due to their age, a direct violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA).
The EEOC filed suit against the company in September 2008 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California (EEOC v. Timeless Investments, Inc. dba EZ Trip Golden State Convenience and Auto/Truck Plaza, Case No. 1:08-CV-01469-AWI-SMS) after pre-litigation efforts to resolve the matter were unsuccessful. The parties entered into a three-year consent decree resulting broad, sweeping injunctive relief and an $11,500 payment to one of the claimants. The decree requires EZ Trip to:
•retain an outside EEO consultant to ensure compliance with the consent decree and provide assistance with the ADEA;
•provide annual training on age bias to management and hourly employees;
•implement provisions against age discrimination to include prohibiting the age inquiry of applicants at the time of application;
•increase recruiting efforts toward older candidates by advertising in publications read by individuals over the age of 40;
•hold employees accountable for engaging in discrimination;
•post a notice on the matter visible by employees; and
•submit annual reports regarding these efforts to the EEOC for the duration of the decree.
“We commend EZ Trip’s efforts in implementing remedies to ensure equal employment opportunities to older workers,” said Anna Y. Park, regional attorney of the EEOC’s Los Angeles District Office. “Age stereotyping continues to remain a problem, and we hope employers proactively ensure that impediments are removed to allow older workers to apply for jobs equally.”
Melissa Barrios, local director of the EEOC’s Fresno Local Office, added, “Older candidates often have a level of work and life experience that can be extremely valuable to prospective employers. Employers need to check their own biases and concentrate on seeking the best qualified candidate for the job at hand, irrespective of age. As that is not always the case, the EEOC is here to help.”
The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination. Further information about the EEOC is available on its web site at www.eeoc.gov
More Workplace Help
- Should I accept offer to come back to my job after getting fired?
- Would touching be considered “sexual harassment”?
- EEOC New Guidance on Using Conducting an Employee Criminal Background Check: AccuScreen CEO Hosts Webinar on April 27th
- Do you still getting paid if you get “laid off”?
- To those who are not transgendered..are you aware of your non-transgender privilege?
- Why shouldn’t employers be allowed to “discriminate”, and hire whomever they are most comfortable hiring?
- Employers, employment and discrimination. Is this discrimination?
- Is this pregnancy discrimination?
- What does an employment lawyer usually do at the first consultation?
- What can you do abut a noncompete agreement you have for a company that “laid you off”.-Ohio?
- Is getting fired for long hair a definition of discrimination?
- Racial / Skin Color Discrimination: Your Legal Advocates
- Got “Laid Off”, but Now Former Employer Is Calling It “Fired”
- Why Did I Get Fired?
- Age Discrimination: Protecting Your Right to Work
Recent Posts
- Should I accept offer to come back to my job after getting fired?
- Would touching be considered “sexual harassment”?
- EEOC New Guidance on Using Conducting an Employee Criminal Background Check: AccuScreen CEO Hosts Webinar on April 27th
- Do you still getting paid if you get “laid off”?
- To those who are not transgendered..are you aware of your non-transgender privilege?
- Why shouldn’t employers be allowed to “discriminate”, and hire whomever they are most comfortable hiring?
- Employers, employment and discrimination. Is this discrimination?
- Is this pregnancy discrimination?
- What does an employment lawyer usually do at the first consultation?
- What can you do abut a noncompete agreement you have for a company that “laid you off”.-Ohio?
- Is getting fired for long hair a definition of discrimination?
- Racial / Skin Color Discrimination: Your Legal Advocates
- Got “Laid Off”, but Now Former Employer Is Calling It “Fired”
- Why Did I Get Fired?
- Age Discrimination: Protecting Your Right to Work
Categories
- Arbitration (1)
- At Will Employment (6)
- Bullying (1)
- COBRA (1)
- Constructive Discharge (1)
- Disability (13)
- Discrimination (72)
- Drug Testing (2)
- Employee Manual (1)
- Employee Polygraphs (1)
- Employment Contracts (2)
- Employment Law (8)
- Employment Law Q & A (465)
- FMLA (5)
- Harassment (34)
- Hiring An Attorney (1)
- Hostile Environment (5)
- Laid Off (2)
- Military Leave (1)
- News (43)
- Polygraph Testing (1)
- Press Release (15)
- Privacy (1)
- Quitting Work (1)
- Retaliation (13)
- Tips & Tactics (4)
- Unemployment Compensation (3)
- Wages (26)
- Whistleblowing (1)
- Workers Compensation (39)
- Wrongful Termination (22)